Thursday, November 19, 2015

Aspect's of writing 'The House on Mango street"

Aspect: They often employ techniques of narrative

The writer of "The House on Mango Street" uses lots of details. Lots. He talks about how the house he will one day have will "have running water and pipes that worked. And inside it will have real stairs, not hallway stairs, but stairs inside like the houses on T.V." and also how the house "would be white with trees around it, and a great big yard and grass growing without a fence." I could really see his imagination of the house that he wanted. And then he described in detail what the actual house looked like. I could just picture it clearly, with its "tight steps in front and windows so small you'd think they were holding their breath." Yes in the beginning he is describing everything bad about the house, but he isn't completely negative, just descriptive, yet in the end he says that his mom says it's only temporary. It moves to a bigger idea of, not everything is permanent, and to hold up your head, things will get better. Don't be negative.

Aspect: They deliver interesting information
In the story, the author says, " They always told us that one day we would move into a house..." and then goes into detail about the house and then ends it with, "But the house on Mango Street is not the way they told us at all." That really makes me interested in what it looked like. In the beginning with him describing all the crappy places they've been, I really wanted them to get that house he was describing. I almost started believing that they would have that dream house, but they didn't and it made me sad for them. It made me want to learn new info about the house they actually got. He tunes you into the story.


Aspect: They exhibit perceptivity
Like I said in the first aspect, the writer isn't ever negative about the descriptions of the house. When he is talking about the actual house he got he only says, "There are stairs in our house, but they're ordinary hallway stairs, and the house has only one washroom. Everybody has to share a bedroom-" Never in the text he said that it was horrible or that he hated it, just simply described it and I feel that that is him showing people to not look so negatively on things, they'll get better. As his momma said" It's only temporary" 

7 comments:

  1. I liked the third paragraph of the Blog. I thought that it wrapped up the blog very well. When looking at his point of view towards the house how can we infer what his point of view are like on other things and his general outlook on things?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Great question. I feel as if he would be the "bigger person" and be more positive about things. He doesn't look at the negatives first, he tries to make the best out of everything.

      Delete
  2. The moral that the author seems to be including is that one should see the good and not the bad. Although he informs us of the negative, he truly appreciates the positive. In the end, even though the house isn't great, it's still a house and it makes all the difference. Has there ever been a time where you have either done something or had something done to you that seemed little, but made all the difference?

    ReplyDelete
  3. I like the quotes that you provided as examples of imagery within the text. I think his descriptions allow the readers to better understand the context of the story. With that being said, do you think that authors should always provide vivid details of setting or at times leave it up to the readers imagination?

    ReplyDelete
  4. I agree with Joe. I also really liked your perceptivity paragraph, which was much different than my thoughts for George Saunders' work. If anything, they're both very matter- of- fact.If you've seen the video from his speech, what connections can you draw between the two?

    ReplyDelete
  5. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete